GVENEWS.COM

3. Central parts of physics are a fraud

By Robbin Koefoed Jakobsen

This article builds upon the same prior knowledge documented in both the two articles; Nuclear energy does not exist and Nuclear weapons does not exist - which to give a summary lifts the veil that alpha particles as well as neutrons does not exist.

If we are to take in foundational established concepts delivered within physics by face value. Then the disclosure in this article of three major frauds leaves us in a situation where the field of physics work against itself.

In 1874, 23 years before the electron was allegedly discovered George Johnstone Stoney (1826-1911) advocated the idea of existing tiny units of electric charge and gave each of them the word electron in 1891.

In 1897 freemason Joseph John Thomson (1856-1940) was credited for discovering the existence of electrons.

"In 1897, the physicist J.J. Thomson [Joseph John Thomson] set out to prove that the cathode rays originating from a heated cathode were actually a stream of small negatively charged particles, now known as electrons. By studying the centripetal acceleration of electrons in a magnetic field, Thomson was able to successfully determine their charge-to-mass ratio. Thomson’s work provided the first empirical evidence that atoms are not themselves fundamental building blocks of matter, paving the way for the field of subatomic physics." - Lancaster University

This reportedly discovery of electrons was done in the exact same place, Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, where both the fraudulent DNA structure and fraudulent neutron also later was claimed discovered.

At a young age the already covered Ernest Rutherford (1871-1937) worked at Cavendish laboratory in Cambridge with his mentor and director of the Cavendish Laboratory Joseph John Thomson.

Now

It was no other than Ernest Rutherford that was part of discovering both the nucleus (center of the atom) and the subatomic particles protons using the phony alpha particles as a foundation for their basis of existence.

The discovery of the nucleus is quoted by the American Physical Society like this

In 1909 ”… alpha particles were observed to scatter backwards from a gold foil. Rutherford’s explanation, which he published in May 1911, was that the scattering was caused by a hard, dense core at the center of the atom–the nucleus.” - The American Physical Society

While the the discovery of the proton is explained like this

”Rutherford envisioned the proton in 1914 when experiments on alpha-particle scattering led him to suggest that the hydrogen nucleus was the carrier of both positive charge and mass in the structure of all heavier atoms. This was supported by his discovery in 1919 that bombardment by alpha particles expelled hydrogen from nitrogen. In 1920, he proposed the name proton for the hydrogen nucleus in this role but refrained from using it, perhaps from what he considered a lack of direct experimental evidence.” - Alfred Romer, Emeritus Professor of Physics at St. Lawrence University

If you’re acquainted with the proof that alpha particles are non-existing as presented in the linked article’s on top it is evident that the precondition for these protons and nuclei (plural of nucleus) have vanished which leaves the proton and the nucleus to become fictitious.

Now

This below quote emphasizes that the universe as we know it would not exist without protons, neutrons and the nucleus.

“Nucleons (protons and neutrons) are the building blocks of atomic nuclei [plural of nucleus] and are responsible for more than 99% of the visible matter in the Universe.” – Quote by Haiyan Gao, Robert C. Richardson Distinguished Professor of Physics and Professor Dr. Marc Vanderhaeghen, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

The point is, in the eye of physics our reality wouldn't be the same with alot of electrons floating around but with no protons, neutrons and nuclei. In accordance with physics many stars in the sky needs both protons and electrons as well as the nuclei to exist in their current form.

Now, here comes a basic explanation of fundamental physics that describe in detail why electrons does not exist.

The center of the atom is named the nucleus. In plural form it is called nuclei.

A proton is a positively charged subatomic particle that is located in the nucleus.

An electron is a negatively charged subatomic particle that, among other things, occupies specific regions around the nucleus.

A neutral atom has the same number of protons and electrons. It is neutral because of the equal balance (the same number) between protons and electrons. This is due to the positive charge of protons and the negative charge of electrons cancel each other out.

When a neutral atom loses or gains electrons and thereby gets what is described as an unequal balance (not the same number) of protons or electrons it becomes an ion.

Losing or gaining (when possible) a proton turns the atom into a different element.

Now

When the nucleus, the center of the atom, doesn’t exist there aren’t the same place for electrons to occupy specific regions around which would cause them impossible to do their (current) job.

And further

If electrons were to exist when protons and the nuclei does not exist all elements of the periodic table would not exist. Humans would neither exist since the human body is constructed of (among others) protons and the nuclei. In addition the phenomenon of ionized elements becomes invalid.

Even if we pretend the nucleus and all the elements of the periodic table did still exist - but without protons - there would be another problem occurring.

An element forming as a neutral atom needs both proton(s) and electron(s). They are depending on each others attraction to function as the laws of physics dictate. This attraction of electrons would not unfold in a situation without protons.

According to natural science neutral atoms are necessary for the existence of present-day planet earth.

Below, a picture of Joseph John Thomson and Ernest Rutherford.